![]() 2) the frequency of long rolls I observed when playing the don't, and getting my bets wiped out. There are two very subjective reasons I even considered this: 1) the number of times I established 2 come bets, and the shooter had a long roll but never hit the points I was on with 3 come bets I cover more than half the possible "good" rolls. My thinking is that with the PL and 3 come bets I have an average of 16 rolls that win vs 6 that lose. I have recently been playing to establish 3 come bets. Is there math to support that limit of 2 come bets? Or, does the reason have more to do with the extreme volatility that is introduced with so many come bets in play, and the massive loss from the 7 out? Most books I have read indicate that one PL bet and 2 come bets are about as high as you should go, after that you get diminishing returns. I now have 2 bets working, but again, I am now bored, so I place a 3rd come bet with odds. Now, given that I am not inclined to just sit there and wait for that point to be decided, I would assume that my next best play is to make a Come bet and take the odds, which provides the same HA as the PL. Okay, it has been shown that the bet with the lowest HA is the DP w odds, but since most of us prefer to play the 'right' side, the second best bet becomes the PL w odds.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |